Paul Magrs

December 31, 2009

Haunted Hogmanay and Right, Ho Jeeves

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 9:34 am


Perfect reading for New Year’s Eve blues: a bit of Jeeves and Wooster and some ghost stories. ‘Haunting Christmas Tales’ is a Scholastic anthology from 1991. Right about that time I think I was bemoaning the fact that the great era of Puffins was more or less gone. Immersed in Susan Cooper and Alan Garner and revisiting other kids’ spooky fantasy books of the Seventies, I really wanted to know that there were still such things being published in the Nineties. Later on I knew about Goosebumps and Point Horror, because my sister Louise loved those books. They were pretty entertaining – if bland and repetitive and completely american, of course. What I never knew was that Scholastic got together a whole set of British kids’ writers in anthologies such as ‘Haunting Christmas Tales’. People like Garry Kilworth (who, elsewhere, published one of my favourite short stories ever), Joan Aiken (actually, ditto), Jill Bennett and Susan Price. For the past couple of years I’ve reread ‘Mysterious Christmas Tales’, a collection with more or less the same people contributing. Last year I found the present volume – the highlight of which for me is, I think, David Belbin’s ‘The Investigators’ – about a boy away at college, making friends with a pair of paranormal researchers.

All of these stories conjure very real worlds of electricity-free cottages in the middle of the countryside, tower blocks and fish and chip shops, comprehensive schools and misty bus rides home. They’re all contemporary-feeling, but with a very strong sense of the Victorian, Edwardian eras… or the period between the wars… because there are figures from those times who come haunting the narrators of these tales. It’s a wonderful book and – of course – mostly unavailable now, outside of Amazon Used-and-New, Ebay, etc. I feel like I’ve found a kind of junior version of the Fontana Books or Horror from twenty years earlier. Just enough to read in a single day – that’s what’s perfect about these. I find those gallumphing Mammoth anthologies of horror stories, etc far too big and unwieldy. Also, those ‘best of’ kind of books don’t have stories written especially for the occasion. With these Scholastic books, you know that this is the story’s first time out in the world. Almost twenty years after publication, this collection feels very fresh. Evergreen.

I discovered there was a third: ‘Creepy Christmas Tales’, in 1992. So that’s on order. I know, I know – this is right before my No More New Books year begins.

Back to Jeeves and Wooster which, you’ll be glad to know, is an elderly Penguin from the Sixties, which has been waiting patiently on my study shelves.

Can you believe I even avoided going to the Borders closing down sales? I went in briefly but it was all too much like a jumble sale. Luckily, I was tempted not in the least to Buy More New Books.

Turn of the Screw last night on BBC 1. Was it me, or was everything spelled out a bit too much? I love Sue Johnston in anything: she made it watchable. But it was another adaptation that was all pretty pictures and bugger all else. I liked the warning at the start that tonight’s Henry James adaptation would feature scenes of a sexual nature. Turn of the Screw with actual screwing, as it were.

December 30, 2009

Best Christmas Telly

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 4:10 pm



We had a lovely Christmas – with family visiting and a houseful for our party on the 28th. In the bits when I wasn’t going from room to room with plates of nibbles or popping corks or wrapping or unwrapping presents I was watching telly. There was quite a lot to get through – I’m quite systematic with the Radio Times. There were some hideous disappointments of course – including a horrible Christmas Day Corrie. Why do they feel the need to turn themselves into Eastenders? I’d love to sit down the people responsible with a disc of Christmas 1965 on the street. I think that was the one with the whole cast doing a pantomime for the kids – or maybe it was the one with Stan Ogden wrestling the Masked Marvel while Annie and Ena drink the Rovers dry of sherry, burying the hatchet at last?

The Triffids adaptation was a waste of time, of course, as many people have pointed out. What is it with BBC and ITV? Do these producers only have about three or four books on their shelves? Can they only do stuff that’s been done before? Are they that convinced that the public will only put up with stuff that THEY ALREADY KNOW? That’s how it seems to go. All these endless remakes and overhaulings of familiar stuff. Umpteen Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyres. Endless Returns to and Reruns of.

The Triffids looked marvellous. Like venomous aloe vera. But there was no need to augment Wyndham’s novels with new material. And what was all that voodoo innoculation rubbish at the end? It was magic, pure and simple. I usually love a touch of the supernatural… but not in John Wyndham. It just seemed an awful betrayal of his book.

I’ll not talk about Doctor Who until the second part’s been on, I think. So far it seems like a remake of the 1996 TV Movie with Paul Mcgann. I so wanted less to be happening. I wanted it to be about Bernard Cribbins and his pensioners dashing around London, trying to prevent the satanic rite in the prison that would bring the Master back to life. That’s enough story for me, frankly.

Anyway – the triumphs.

Just recently I was saying Jeanette Winterson’s recent novels have disappointed me. As a long-term reader of hers I was feeling out of touch and disgruntled. But Christmas Day morning there was ‘Ingenious’ – an hour long kids’ drama set in Cheshire, in the shadow of Jodrell Bank. With this tale of an arabian genie and a dragon and una stubbs as a retired witch, she won me over all over again. It was a proper old fashioned kids’ drama. It has to be a pilot. I can’t bear it if it’s a one-off. C’mon, there’s a series, isn’t there? There must be. We need to know! The episode was credited as being ‘created’ as well as written by Jeanette, so here’s hoping it’s a franchise in the making. In so many ways it was more Doctor Who than Doctor Who was. And Una Stubbs is a saint, in a quietly pent-up with anguish kind of way.

My other favourite TV thing – which I’ve waited yonks to see – the HBO movie of ‘Grey Gardens’ with Drew Barrymore and Jessica Lange. I love the 1975 documentary about Jackie O’s bonkers aunt and cousin. It’s an eye-popping experience, first seeing that film. It’s the definition of tragicamp. This new film – slipping the backstory and afterstory through the making of the documentary film is sublime. It’s a beautifully made and acted piece of work. A labour of love, you can tell.

On radio I loved Radio 4’s ‘Someone Like You’ – yet another retelling of five of Roald Dahl’s ‘Tales of the Unexpected’. As if they needed them. But again, it’s SOMETHING WE’VE HEARD OF. But they were made very nicely – Charles Dance and weird Mantovani chillout theme and all. But why couldn’t it have been five stories by R Cheywynd Hayes or Rosemary Timperley? Is it because NO ONE WILL HAVE HEARD OF THEM? And that would scare the producers and the commissioning people?

Gimme something I’ve never heard of. Make me fall in love with something new. Some of the old stuff is great but I hate the idea that people assume we’re all middlebrow, cretinous and timid in our choices.

Though – if we’re gonna have old stuff remixed and remade over Christmas… I wish Doctor Who had been about the triffids fighting dinosaurs and daleks on the streets of London on Christmas Day. That’d have been fun. Chap with tendrils, Sergeant Benton…!

December 24, 2009

The Christmas Hoover

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 1:05 pm


I think that, round ours, we’re cursed with hoovers. We’re doomed with them. We seem to buy at least one a year. In comes the new one, full of promise. Its ailing elders sit around the house and they’ve seen it all before. They’re looped in tubing and festooned with leads. What are they hoping for? That we’ll plug them in and we’ll give them another go? Maybe a rest will have restored them to maximum suck?

J.’s just destroyed our most recent model. No, it’s the one before the one before last. The one that languished in the over-crowded cellar for a while. We should have known it couldn’t be relied upon. But we pressganged the poor thing back into service. Sure enough, Christmas Eve lunchtime – getting the house prepared for the fun to come – there’s a terrible scene. J. loses his temper and hoys the hoover out the front door. Now he’s out there smashing it into splinters, on the very spot he chops up firewood.

Now the hoover’s shattered and lying in pieces on the drive. Its dusty, fluffy, cat-hairy innards lie exposed in the snow. The brown paper bag of its heart has collapsed.

Out went the Dyson, several months ago. The orange thing that’s supposed to swoosh hot soapy water about – that’s even less cop. What it did really well was produced gallons of fermented, gunky soup.

In a wild and wonderful Christmas story the hoover would lie outside now on the ice and slush of our front path. It would lie there all day as the light faded. It would leak some lint and bits of fluff and try not to despair too much. At midnight tonight there would be a visitation by some kind of household appliance fairy. The whole thing would be observed by the various snowmen, Santas and Christmas ducks on our tree in the dining room. They had witnessed the whole atrocity that followed when the hoover had coughed and choked and sucked his last.

The Christmas toys and baubles would watch the Appliance Fairy bringing the hoover back to life. The hoover would be like Cinderella submitting to the ministrations of her Godmother. He’d gaze down at himself. He’d pull himself together with hardly any effort. Pulsating and glowing. His various panels would click into place around his fully-functioning and now decongested parts. His cables and tubing flash out like lasoos. Easily, with no snarling or tangling for the first time ever. Now it’s time to set off and fly about the rooftops of Manchester. The snow’s been bad. He could suck up the excessive drifting and leave just enough snow to keep the place decorative.

I told J: ‘That’s what I’ll write. My Christmas Story this year will be about our hoover and how you knacked it. I *was* going to write a proper ghost story. I was going to write about that story my Mam told me on the phone the other night. About the guitar she and her twin were given by my Big Nanna when they were thirteen. The guitar that had mysteriously played itself in the night. But I’ll hold that over for now and write the Christmas Hoover story instead and you’ll be the big bad villain who reduced it to smithereens on Christmas Eve…’

He shrugged like he couldn’t care less about the hoover. He was thinking about new hoovers. Thinking about the Sales to come on Boxing Day and everyone going bonkers in the Trafford Centre. The new appliances nervously waiting in showrooms and the pushing and shoving of the queues. Well, I can’t stand sales these days, personally, so maybe I’ll stay home in the half-vacuumed house.

Tonight I reckon that the Christmas Hoover will sweep up over Levenshume and Fallowfield and up Victoria Park. It’ll soar over the towers of the Palace Hotel and the Town Hall and across the dome of the Central Library. It’ll swing about the Arndale Centre, now miraculously empty of shoppers and then it’ll swoosh up the frozen canals. Startling geese and – what was it Alicia saw by the canal yesterday? – the ocasional heron. Then up and down the neon bunting of the Curry Mile and the crisp blankness of Platt Fields park. Chugging along on its tiny motor. Not clapped out yet. Through the wintry clouds: our hoover moonlighting far away from home. Longer than any lead would stretch. He’ll be turning end over end. No one to push him around. Deciding where he wants to go for himself.

I’m not sure where he’ll end up in the early hours. Snowmen melt, don’t they? Reindeer return to their stables in the far north. Fairies dissipate in a shower of tinsel. I reckon our hoover will come shuffling back up the gravel of our front garden in the dark hours before dawn. He’ll know the house has loads of broken things that might yet get mended. He’ll sit by the door on Christmas morning and cough politely and hopefully.

Klee’s Little Pine Tree

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 9:50 am


These are two of my favourite Christmas paintings: they’re on the wall of my study all year round – Paul Klee’s ‘The Little Pine Tree’ from 1922 and ‘Snowballing at Stenico Castle’ dated 1400. They were both Christmas cards a few years ago and for some reason I like the combination of the two.

The snow came down again last night. J. went out at midnight to take photos of the streets of Levenshulme and the sky looked green. We’d had an afternoon in town with Alicia – having lunch in one of my favourite Northern Quarter cafes, Teacup (formerly Cup – I think I preferred it when it was less smartened up…) Lots of slip-sliding about on the impacted ice.

Still not buying books…! But I’m going to be doing some reviewing again. The grumpy postman just brought two parcels to our door. More on this later. J. says I’ve found a way round my No More New Books resolution… hmmm. But I’m looking forward to these new proofs in the post.

So… we’ve got everything we need, I think. The fridge and cupboards are stocked up. There’s a huge turkey in the fridge and a wallopping leg of lamb in the freezer (Last night’s Radio4 adaptation of ‘Lamb to the Slaughter’ top notch, by the way. PLEASE next year – following M.R James and Dahl – could we have another series? Anyway, why isn’t it more regular? What happened to Radio4’s wonderful ‘Fear on Four’? I must dig those episodes out. When did that stop..?)

It’s Christmas Eve and we’re all set, I think.

I hope I’ll post again between now and then – if not – Happy Christmas, everyone. It’s been a quick-quick-slow shakey-up kind of year round here. There’s been disasters and fall-outs and dramas and unbelievable stuff. But there’s been a lot of laughs and loads of work, and making up brand new stuff, and favourite characters returning and some modest triumphs too, I reckon. Like any Soap worth its salt. (I’m reviewing the year – I shouldn’t be – that should be next week, shouldn’t it?) I think it’s Marc Almond singing ‘Say hello, wave Goodbye’ on Stuart’s sublime Spotify list just now – that’s put me in a reflective mood. Get the Carols back on!

December 23, 2009

Christmas Viewing has started…

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 7:16 am


Last night we watched four of the annual Christmas-episodes-of-things. It used to be Christmas Eve, but there’s so many of the things to get through now…

THE REAL CHRISTMAS SHOW. Gaby Roslin’s video diary programme from 1996, covering Christmas for a group of different families. This gets more brilliant by the year. Thirteen years on, even the awfulness and toe-curling embarrassment of some moments have gained a pathos. And I’m convinced I saw that scouse woman on the plane to Portugal this summer. I keep revisiting this show each year and it’s like a bunch of old friends – like a kind of festive GHOSTWATCH.
K9 AND COMPANY. The 1981 pilot for a show that didn’t happen until twenty six years later. This is ropey in so many ways, but I love it. That magical moment when Sarah helps K9 out of the crate, where he’s waited for years. The fact that he has to do battle with ordnance survey maps and a snotty public schoolboy, and satanist market gardeners as soon as he comes to life. Interesting to see how snappy and twitchy Sarah is all the way through this – and how other characters comment on her touchiness. The simpering, satin-clad hermaphrodite Juno who lives in a nearby cottage and is the obvious, sheeny red herring all the way through is a marvellous creation. They should bring her back these days, I think. This episode’s at its best when it’s closest to being the Wicker Man, featuring a cross journalist in mohair, a robot dog and sundry sly rustics.
THE BOX OF DELIGHTS ep 2. We’re behind this year. Usually we watch an episode a week, leading up to Christmas. We should be coming to the end – but episode 2 is fun, anyway. It’s the long animated sequence when Kay opens the box and Herne the Hunter asks him to come and run in the wild forest with him. They turn into deer and ducks and trout. The same series of transformations appears in both ‘The Sword in the Stone’ and ‘The Dark is Rising.’ Anyone know the source of this? The old magician mentor takes his apprentice on a swift run of changes?
CHRISTMAS SPIRITS. This is a 1983 ITV Ghost Story for Christmas written by Willis Hall. Faded aristos trying to hire out their haunted mansion to a film company as a location. Location scout gets stuck in house on Christmas Eve and gets driven batty by the spirits of murderous children. Obviously spurred on by the brilliant BBC Christmas Ghost Tales – ITV decided to have a stab at the genre one year. Hmmm… let’s hire Elaine Stritch. The whole thing is wonderful and demented. I love the spectacle of Stritch racketing up and down the set, clutching the banisters and shrieking like a chainsmoking banshee – especially when Stephanie Cole hovers round her.
That’s our first night of Christmas watching… by a crackling log fire – crackling old VHS and ancient studio-bound drama…
The other thing last night was the second episode of Radio4’s ‘Someone Like You’ – five radio adaptations of classic Roald Dahl stories. They are done really, really well. Last night was ‘Skin’, which has never been creepier. Well done to whoever made them!

December 22, 2009

Novels in the Nineties

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 8:06 am



Having made my list, the other day, of favourite novels of the decade – one per year – I promised I’d do the same for the Nineties, didn’t I? And, when I said it, I imagined my list would be chilly and bleak – which, for some reason, is how I remember fiction from that decade. But I was wrong! Here they are:

1990 The Passion – Jeanette Winterson.

(I read everything of hers on first publication until, I think, ‘Lighthousekeeping.’ I’ve been through so many phases with Jeanette W. Adoration of those first three or so novels, when she couldn’t do wrong in my eyes. Even neglecting to have a story or losing track of who her narrator was and blaming it all on spirals, on fairy tales, blaming it on the boogie, whatever. I loved it all. I even passionately defended her when others jeered at ‘Art Objects’ or ‘Art and Lies’ or her Fitness Book. But gradually she’s faded away for me. The brilliant critic Paulina Palmer tried to talk me round ‘The Powerbook’ over dinner at the Gothic conference last July, but I still couldn’t learn to love that book. When she’s good Jeanette is incandescent. When she’s bad… it’s like she’s printed off twenty half finished short stories from her hard drive and tossed them together. She’s found a / the canny conceit to link them.

Oh, look. That sounds carping. I love Jeanette! This will be a top ten of novelists I loved in the Nineties. And still love. But it’s having affairs, isn’t it, reading novels? You’re in and out of love like you are luxury hotels. I’ve carried her books around with me, I’ve flung them from me, as far as they can go. That’s what being someone’s reader is like. I’ll go back to her. I will! I’ll catch up again!)

1991 Wise Children – Angela Carter. I applied for funding for my Phd on Carter about two months before she died. It was a weird time, because she was coming to life for me, so wonderfully, so completely on the page. When I read ‘Wise Children’ it was during my Creative Writing MA and it was amazing to read someone doing a low comic turn – a cockney voice – the raucous low demotic – and using it to talk about life, art, theory, society, culture. All the things a voice like that ain’t supposed to know about. The book’s a glorious kick up the arse for supposed high culture. It’s a punch up the hooter. Angela Carter was such a big part of my reading, studying, thinking, writing life for a number of years afterwards.

1992 Saint Maybe – Anne Tyler. Which I’ve written about somewhere else on this blog. Carter and Winterson were my twin goddesses of intellectual glamour in the Nineties. For flashiness and blinding wit and fan-dances with wolves. Anne Tyler was my antidote to showy excess and in-your-face cleverness. She’s subtle and unassuming. She later became a worldwide phenomenon and people started reading her in earnest, giving the kudos she deserved. ‘Saint Maybe’ was the one I loved the best. She’s got the lightest of touches. She hides all of her working-out miraculously. She writes about embarrassment, obligation and the way families invent their own mythologies. Not flashy, fashionable subjects. And it’s been an era that praises fiction that gets overwrought and revels in its own conspicuous effort… I’m glad Anne Tyler’s still doing what she does.

1993 Maybe the Moon – Armistead Maupin. I’m writing too much about each book. I need to quicken this up. One of my favourite novels ever. Another one that I’ve reread a lot. My friend Alicia and I went to see him read it in a smart hotel’s literary lunch on Deansgate in Manchester in 1993. We had to share round tables with strangers, like at a wedding, and eat prawns and melon balls sprinkled with nutmeg. I remember he read brilliantly, though he must have done it a thousand times on that tour. We had our book signed and I marvelled at the idea of sitting there, signing new hardbacks for people who couldn’t wait to take them home to gobble up. The novel is a wonder. A showbiz midget’s raucous fairy tale. And again, much, much cleverer and subtle than anyone would give it credit for. Because it’s popular and funny and the midget has a dirty mouth.

1994 The Lights of Manchester by Tony Warren. The first novel by Coronation Street’s creator. A hefty saga, brimming with melodrama and fondness for its teeming cast of characters. I sat agog all one Christmas with this. He did three more, partially linked to this, by theme and / or characters. It was like he was building a Manc Tales of the City. With hints of Howard Spring and Masie Mosco.

1995 Anne Tyler again – ‘Ladder of Years.’ I was sent it for free, which made it even nicer. In 1995 I sold my first novel and it was to Chatto and Windus, and in paperback to Vintage. So that meant I was sharing a publisher and catalogue space with Winterson, Carter and Anne Tyler. ‘Ladder of Years’ came out just after I’d signed the contract for ‘Marked for Life.’ My editor sent me it as a gift, as I worked on my copy-edits. (It was all so quick! Bought in April – out in November!) It was a strange time, really. I’d been reading this stuff. Now I was amongst it. Weird being in that Chatto catalogue – with the Angela Carter-painted cover – to be in there with AS Byatt, Iris Murdoch, and all these grand dames. It felt reachable, somehow. Tangible.

1996 Got to choose two, sorry. Georgina Hammick’s ‘The Arizona Game’ and Patricia Duncker’s ‘Hallucinating Foucault.’

1997 ‘My Silver Shoes’ by Nell Dunn

1998 ‘The Object of my Affection’ by Stephen McCauley

1999 ‘The Hours’ by Michael Cunningham

So it was in the Nineties that I really discovered what it was I liked to read and explore. This, through a process of reading everything I could get hold of. I read quite a few stinkers to get there. But I found I loved formally quite complicated books – but ones that somehow hid that fact: they made their complexity seem inevitable, as if rising out of the circumstances and demands of their characters’ lives. The immediacy of the characters’ voices was what hid the book’s scaffolding, so carefully, so apparently easily. I loved books about women of a certain age and gay men. I loved magical realism, outrageous fantasy – but wonderfully observed realism, too. I loved these things all jammed together. I loved ensemble casts. Rollicking tales that intertwine. I love jokes and ludicrous anecdotes. I still can’t see why so many novels are po-faced.

Tha’s my list, anyway, for the last decade but one. That’s two lists covering twenty years I’ve given you! What do you think?

December 21, 2009

Christmas with Liberace, Disney, Buckaroo

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 12:04 pm



Lovely dinner guests round here on Saturday – a night with games of Buckaroo and Kerplunk and J. digging out the old vinyl – Christmas with Liberace and a Disney album that, it turned out, almost everyone present had a copy of as a child. The Ronco one with the poorly-drawn cover.

We’re loving the snow here in Levenshulme still. It ushered in the festive season proper this weekend. We’ve braved the crowds in the foodhall at M+S and the Trafford Centre going bonkers on the last Sunday before Christmas.

I loved the ending of George Selden’s ‘The Cricket in Time Square’ and, doing a little light research, was delighted to find there were a number of sequels. He writes with such warmth, compassion and atmosphere. Why don’t we know of him in the UK at all? The Puffin copy I’ve got dates from the Sixties and I don’t think he’s currently in print here. He seems like a glaring omission. How come there was no big Disney movie – in the Seventies, say – some time around The Fox and the Hound?

Anyway – the Christmas reading goes on! I’m now reading George Mann again. I’m devouring the first of his Newbury and Hobbes novels, ‘The Affinity Bridge’ and am just ready for that cosy steampunk atmosphere – crashed zeppelins and glowing blue policemen and all…

I’m right between projects now, on the writing front! I’ve paused halfway through one top secret project and have delivered to my agent. Then on January the first I start another top secret project. Day one, page one, that’ll be. But now’s the lovely time inbetween. The way my writing works these days, commuting from one project to another is like going to stay with different sets of old friends. The small lulls between are regathering thoughts en route and biding time quite pleasantly on the train. Watching the snowy landscape, chewing toffees. Imagining the adventures to come.

Was it just me or was the Cranford TV special a bit miserable last night? Deaths in childbirth and people keeling over all over the place? I’d been looking forward to going back and revisiting that world… and it was good – it was very good – but it was taking itself very seriously, though. I mean, really, at Christmas I kind of want TV dramas to be a bit light and festive and silly.

Here’s a piece from the news this morning. Here’s a pantomime I’d have liked to have been at:

“Singer Amy Winehouse is facing a police investigation for allegedly lashing out at a theatre manager after subjecting panto actors to a stream of abuse.

“The troubled star is said to have disrupted a performance of Cinderella on Saturday night by heckling the cast.

“She is later alleged to have launched a physical attack on a member of staff at the theatre in Milton Keynes, Buckinghamshire.

“The Back to Black singer was said to have shocked children and parents by shouting “He’s f****** behind you” during the performance and yelling out “F****** Cinders, Prince Charming, marry me”.

“Refusing to sit down, she also branded the Ugly Sisters “bitches”, The Sun reported.”

The only other place – apart from our dinner party in Levenshulme – I’d have liked to be this Saturday night was Time Square in NYC. Have you seen those pictures of the snowball fight on the street?

December 19, 2009

Charlotte’s Web and Stephanie Plum

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 8:20 am



Both SFX Magazine and the Times Literary Supplement gave Hell’s Belles very nice reviews this week. The TLS reviewer says: ‘The skill of the author, apart from the jokes, is to give characters taken from previous novels a real presence in addition to their supernatural one.’ I think she means my habit of adopting Gothic characters from out-of-print texts and trying to bring them to life in the here and now. She also, happily, sees the link with E.F Benson’s Mapp and Lucia, which I was very chuffed about.

Here’s a nice piece of mail that highlights a real problem though…

“hello Paul
just wanted to let you know, that i’ve had a right game trying to get hold of hells belles ! I’m in the midlands area and have been to book shops in Merry hill, Brum, Wolverhampton and Walsall !!!

in the end ive had to go to Amazon

i’m desperate to get my hands on it and def hope its here for christmas

your books are amazing, your imagination amazing, your storytelling captivating

thank you and merry christmas

Rach x”

Hope Rach doesn’t mind me reprinting! But any post to me is in danger of ending up on my blog… She brings up a pet peeve – the stocking of my books in bookshops. All I can do is tell people to keep asking them to order them in! They’ll get them for you. These shops just need a bit more encouragement to restock me on the shelves and to get me in those ubiquitous three-for-two piles. So, keep badgering them, everyone.

Okay – Christmas reading is going on apace.

Why did no one ever tell me I HAD to read Janet Evanovich? The first in her Stephanie Plum series, ‘One for the Money’ has been sitting on my shelves for years. I had a feeling it would be too hard-boiled or butch, somehow. But I loved it! This hapless, gung-ho New Jersey broad with her beat-up car and her determination to become a bounty hunter. The whole thing is wonderfully plotted and sparky with one-liners and some fantastic set-pieces and twists. LOVED IT. Now I want more. There’s fifteen, isn’t there? I love all her secondary characters. The gruff Grandma in her lime green shorts and sexy Joe Morelli, the man she’s ostensibly hunting… Why did no one insist I read it? Why didn’t I read this when it came out, fifteen years ago?

But then I guess it’s all a process of ambling along, making up our own reading lives. Sometimes taking recommendations, sometimes not – depending on the fervour and the person giving them. Sometimes things pass us by completely and we let them, thinking they mustn’t be our kind of thing: they’re the wrong genre, the wrong type of character, the wrong picture on the cover. The wrong typeface inside. The only way of knowing is by sitting down properly and reading that first chapter. That’s the only way to know whether it’s your thing or not. That’s what I say.

I reread ‘Charlotte’s Web’ – again. I think there’s real magic in that book. A sense of genuine, magical empathy, I love the way that the little girl, Fern, simply peels away from the story – her attention as she grows up drifting away from the barn and the pig and sitting on the stool, listening to the animals talking. That rings so true, somehow. She vanishes from the book and there’s a sadness in that – but the reader is too busy being caught up with the drama of Wilbur and Charlotte and Templeton. I love these characters and revisit them often these days.

The scenes with the spider’s egg sac and the very moment that the first baby spider pops up – to be followed by five hundred siblings – is very powerful. As is the bit where they parachute away in a cloud of gossamer balloons, leaving Wilbur bereft again. We had a spider exodus like this in our garden a couple of years ago. J. and I spent a whole spring afternoon watching these space stations tucked under the branches of tall garden plants simply exploding with gentle, silent WHOOMPHS. And then the air was filled with tiny spiders on missions – legs akimbo and fearless in their thousands. Geronimo! There are some photos J. took somewhere – I’ll have to dig them out.

My latest love, though, is a book that came out of that random pile of ten I listed here the other day. When I was making my point about unearthed treasure in the house – and how I’m going to stop in my tracks and buy No More Books until I’ve explored some of what’s already here. Anyway – I posted the cover of a book I knew next to nothing about – ‘A Cricket in Times Square’ by George Selden, from 1960. I read most of it yesterday evening and it’s just wonderful. Delightful. Something – again – I wish I’d come across much earlier, so this could be a rereading. (Strange, that.) More about it soon. Anyone else know this fantastic book..?

December 18, 2009

Ten Novels of the Decade

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 10:03 am



I just realised it’s the end of the decade. Funny – I think I was sickened off such turning points with the whole millenium thing. Bit of a squib, that one. Especially in Norwich, where we were living just then…

Anyway, I thought I’d try to work out my ten favourite novels of the decade. It’s distorted because I’ve allowed myself just one book per year and some years were much better than others. Sometimes my favourite book was an old one I’d eventually gotten round to and sometimes it was non-fiction. But here are the novels, anyway – one per year through this pretty tumultuous decade:

2000: Chocolat – Joanne Harris.
2001 – Kavalier and Clay – Michael Chabon
2002 – Carnevale – M R Lovric
2003 – Dancer – Colum McCann
2004 – Shadow of the Wind – Carlos Ruiz Zafon
2005 – Mr Starlight – Laurie Graham
2006 – Hot to Trot – Lou Wakefield
2007 – The Woman on the Fifth – Douglas Kennedy
2008 – The Palace of Strange Girls – Sallie Day
2009 – The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society – Marie Schaffer and Annie Barrows

So… I like epic stories set over decades, or decades ago… with quite a bit of comedy and romance… probably classed as the more popular end of literary fiction… something life-affirming with eccentric ensemble casts of characters… with touches of showbiz, arty stuff or detective / adventure gubbins. My very favourites seem to have to include a bit of all this stuff. (I might have to go back to my reading journals to see how the Nineties compare. Somehow I think contemporary novels in that decade were altogether bleaker. These are pretty sparkly, on the whole…)

December 17, 2009

Two recommended websites – and a nice review

Filed under: Uncategorized — Paul Magrs @ 12:11 pm



June Hudson has got a new website (www.junehudson.com), showcasing her costume design work over the years. There are some wonderful, familiar drawings of Doctor Who characters circa 1980 (my favourite pictures are from the sublime ‘Warrior’s Gate’.) But there are unfamiliar and new images, there, too. Did you know, for example, that June was responsible for the exact look of Mrs Slocombe and Mr Humphries in ‘Are You Being Served’? Just look at her drawings from 1972 – somehow she just captures their attitudes, and the precise way that these iconic characters will hold themselves.

The other recommendation is Mark Clapham’s blog (http://www.rollbackandmix.blogspot.com/) on which he reviews and posts about all kinds of cultural tat, atefacts and phenomena. He’s just posted a stonking review of Hornets’ Nest, which I’m very pleased with – and which I hope he won’t mind me reprinting here.

“Next up, a Doctor Who story (or stories). With Who dominating the airwaves over Christmas, any more might seem excessive, but Hornet’s Nest, a series of five CDs from BBC Audiobooks, is distinctly different from the all-ages bombast of the current TV show.

“Thankfully, in spite of marking Tom Baker’s first proper return to the role after only brief appearances in telethons and theme nights, Hornet’s Nest isn’t a direct return to a version of the character and the show that played itself out over the actor’s long initial run and has been strip-mined in novels, short stories and comic strips ever since.

“Paul Magrs story/stories – the five CDs are linked into one narrative, but are each distinct – is/are closer to being an imaginary BBC4 Who spin-off to sit alongside the ones on BBC3 and CBBC, a version of that universe aimed at an older audience that remembers Ghost Stories for Christmas with fondness, shot on a low budget and aiming for slow burning chills. It’s essentially a series of fireside tales exchanged between Baker’s Doctor and retired soldier Mike Yates, two old men sharing scary stories and going on one last big adventure.

“The insistence on drawing a seventies period Tom on the covers, and placing it within that continuity in the dialogue, seems unnecessary and intrusive, a handwavy sop to obsessives and the BBC licensing department, who doubtless frown upon spin-offs chucking a brick through such continuity staples as which-Doctor-regenerated-when. This is an older Tom different to the one who descended into boggle-eyed tedium on-screen, and a different type of Who story tailored to it’s leads current tastes, a story full of the macabre and weird, as well as cottages, wolfhounds and whiskey.

“Magrs makes a virtue of writing for his star’s tastes, and goes full-tilt with a story that’s genuinely creepy in places, and even manages to make that repetitive staple of early Tom stories, possession by aliens, work in a new and interesting way. The acting is fantastic, Tom being better here than a lot of his TV appearances, maybe better than he’s ever been and Richard Franklin’s older Captain Yates is certainly more interesting than the uncomfortable romantic lead he was cast as in the 70s. While a couple of the supporting cast hit the button marked ‘northern whimsy’ with a repetitive frenzy I could have lived without, there are great turns by the likes of Michael Maloney and Stephen Thorne – and in what other medium than radio could the towering Thorne play an Italian midget, hmm?

“Hornet’s Nest is an entertaining, spooky new take on Who, and well worth investing in, an atmospheric treat for the cold winter months.

Mark”

Older Posts »

Powered by WordPress